Tags
B&M, bicycle commuting, blinkies, blinky, commute, cycling, flashlight, FUD, night cycling, safety, Schmidt, visibility
For a few years on my commute from North Seattle into Downtown, I was often annoyed when an oncoming cyclist held up his hand to block my light from his eyes. I noticed that it was the same guy, and my reaction was initially anger. I was like how dare you act like my lights are annoying you when they are necessary for my safety in the darker times of my commute. I am just now starting to understand this fella’s angst…
I bought into the common wisdom that more must be better, and so was on the path of MORE wattage, MORE blinks, MORE patterns, etc. These lights are bright, so they must be MORE safe since drivers have to notice a blinking light in a sea of steady night lighting. FUD. It seems that in search of constant upgrades for new sales, “excessive” products are often pushed here in America – the land of fake safety. When does this really end? When cyclists are relegated to wearing bright lime-green reflective strobe encrusted LED sumo safety suits? I can just see the headlines.
“Cyclist killed. Was not wearing the ACME strobe suit. No charges for the motorist who explained – I never saw him…”
After using blinking lights front and rear for a few years, I’ve now switched to steady dynamo lights powered by my front hub. Besides the amazingly better light coverage and visibility I get from my Schmidt and B&M lights, I’ve formed into the opinion that blinking lights are, at best, less effective than steady beams, and most of the time just pointlessly dangerous for both the rider, and the people they are approaching. Most of the popular “blinky” lights are toys for the uninitiated fearful commuter to waste money on and throw away after a season or two. It has also been argued that blinking lights can actually draw drivers (drunk?) into collisions with cyclists, much like moths to a flame. Update – another link on the “moth effect“.
If you are using a blinking front light, I would question that you have any ability to see what you’re riding toward. Judging distance is greatly impaired under strobe light. Just try playing baseball, football, soccer, or basketball under a strobe. Tennis would be hilarious. So would car racing. Hmmm – or bicycle commuting. I’m actually surprised people manage to keep it together as much as they do, though I would bet that most folks turn off the forward strobe after doing this for a few months, and the people I see using them are just the endless stream of the newly initiated to the glory of the new commute method where they also get exercise.
OK – for those that graduate from using blinking lights, what’s with the flashlight beams? Why do manufacturers continue to just repackage flashlights into a bike mount? This type of light has no cutoff to keep light from being directed directly into the eyes of oncoming traffic (or cyclists). This is completely idiotic – it’s relatively simple and cheap to use mirrored reflectors to put all that nice light below head-level and on the road in front of you where you need it. Cars haven’t had these kinds of lights for 40 years. If normal traffic (which even on a bike path, we are a part of) used circular beam flashlights, everyone would have to have tinted front windows, and we would likely have many accidents caused by oncoming blinding lights. When someone with a 600 lumen flashlight beam is coming at me on the Burke-Gilman path, I have to look away from them, and not track their progress as I approach. That’s just not safe. I always worry that I’ll miss the unlit pedestrian that is between us, or worse, veer into the approaching cyclist or their buddy pedaling next to them. Wow – how annoying are these devices! Wake up folks – you are just pissing off your fellow bikers and making things less safe.
Courtesy and common sense can make cycling a lot safer and more enjoyable:
- If you are on a bike/pedestrian path, use a steady beam and point your flashlight at the road to keep the beam beneath oncoming cyclist’s eyes.
- Better yet – get a good European focused, purpose-made bicycle light.
- If you have folks riding behind you, turn off the blinking red lights. My steady red twilight is visible a mile away too. It doesn’t need to blink. Get some real fenders, too.
Some questions to ponder:
- Is your priority seeing the road in front of you, or merely being as visible as possible from the front?
- If you are worried that cars won’t see you and turn or pull out in front of you, can you take other action to minimize the accident potential here? Maybe not just bomb the hill with a big light to protect you?
- Don’t you want to see the road obstruction that may take you down? Steady light in front of you is pretty useful.
- Do you feel that your need to be seen should be at the cost of your fellow riders safety? It’s not.
Give steady lights a chance. If you are really concerned with your safety, read the stats. You are 33x more likely to be killed in a passenger car, and 7x more likely to be killed as a pedestrian or on a motorcycle. Bikes are a safe and healthy method for commuting. Your visibility and view of the road ahead is made better with good, safe, focused European standard dynamo or battery lights like those made by Busch & Muller or Schmidt. These are not too different from the modern lights on automobiles that keep the light focused and bright where you need it. Think about your fellow cyclists, too. It’s a growing community, and we need to be kind and safe around each other.
I don’t have any flashing lights. I use a fog light mounted on my handle bar. I can aim the beam down when there is oncoming traffic and I can re aim it up accordingly when the oncoming traffic is gone, My taillight is one of the 4″ round LED lights you see on trailers. I epoxied it over my back reflector. They both run off or a 12v battery pack (the pack uses 8 AA batteries). I live in farm country, so I don’t know about urban cycling, but I know I have always been accorded the respect on the road that I would get as a motorist (I’m one of those too so I can see things like this both ways). Blinkie lights are mostly annoying to motorists. For what a decent set of blinkie lights can cost, you can go to wallyworld and get the non-strobing lights you need.
Another blog post with another take on this. Blinky lights may confuse drivers? http://www.commutebybike.com/2011/11/12/blinkiology-the-study-of-rear-blinkies/
Another good link explaining the Moth Effect. http://www.visualexpert.com/Resources/motheffect.html The author still draws the conclusion that he will use blinking lights. May be a bit flawed based on the science, but shows this is getting to that religious argument phase. Multi-dimensional conclusions based on what’s important. The big one that has been pushed commercially is “it’s better to be seen than see”. I would say both are equally important, and still argue that you have to take into account being part of a cycling community, and not an island riding home in a sea of other bikers who don’t matter.
You (and Grant) are trying to assert that blinky lights somehow increase target fixation, but you aren’t providing any evidence of that. My sample of one: the only time I’ve been hit from behind I had a battery powered non-blinking taillight. Granted, the driver was legally blind, but really that just gives us a data point that non-blinkies might attract visually impaired people. Maybe drunks also fit into that bucket? Mostly, show me the data 🙂
Also, for mtn biking the shaped beam lights are less than wonderful. My commute home involves a half mile of trail with blackberry bushes for the full length and I’ve been snagged by thorny vines that were just above the beam pattern and thus invisible, enough so that I’ve taken to supplementing my Luxos for that half mile.
I agree that blinking headlights used as the sole source of forward vision are particularly stupid, and I suspect are only used by commuters that don’t really need the headlight to see.
Question – were you hit at night or during the day? I don’t have a problem with blinking lights during the day, though I would question their effectiveness. At least they don’t strobe out my eyes during the day like they do at night. Rode home behind a bunch of them tonight and couldn’t even look at the bikes in front of me half the ride. As for mt biking lights – that’s a topic I’ve not tried to cover here. I agree, you would be fine with a flashlight in the woods, and there would probably not be the problem with oncoming blindings unless you’re on a popular cross country trail at night.
100% agree. However, unless bike lights are regulated like in Europe, people will buy whatever is marketed to them. There’s a mindset that blinding oncoming traffic is a good thing.
Yes. We really just need folks to get off the “me” parade here. I’m not sure I’m about more regulation, but when common sense fails, I guess that may be the next step. This is more about opening the other side of the coin as I haven’t seen too many blogs or articles about the blinky epidemic…